Have something to say?

Welcome to the SageMaster Feedback Forum! Share your thoughts, feature requests, and bug reports here. Your feedback is valuable and helps us improve our trading platform. Thank you for being a part of the SageMaster community!

Added to Backlog

Improving Transparency for Trade Provider Performance Metrics

Challenges arise particularly with high-frequency strategies using tight entries, stop-losses, and take-profit levels. Due to external factors beyond system control—such as broker liquidity, spread differences, slippage, latency, volatility, and timezones—the same trade idea can lead to different execution outcomes across users (TP, SL, break-even, or no execution). While provider-based statistics may be structurally correct, they are not reliably reproducible at scale across multiple brokers and real market conditions. Proposed Improvement Introduce an additional performance layer based on aggregated real-account execution data, calculated: per Trade Provider per strategy Displayed alongside existing statistics, this would clearly distinguish between: Theoretical / Provider Performance Real-Account Average Performance This approach cannot eliminate execution variance, but it provides the most realistic and transparent representation of expected outcomes, especially for high-frequency strategies.

Stefan Kassing About 1 month ago

💡

Feature Request

Added to Backlog

Dynamic Lot Sizing Visualization Improvement

I am reporting an improvement based on this exact customer inquiry in Discord : ‘Hey, quick question to the backtest tool. Is it calculating with increasing lotsize? Since 1% Risk Management will mean higher lotsize with increasing balance. Didn't see it in the results or anywhere. So i was curios about I have investigated this using an initial balance of $10,000 and 20 leverage. The system is scaling dynamically. For the exact same 2-pip move on Gold (11/06/2025 at 02:20 AM), the profit changed based on the risk setting, proving that the lot size is recalculating at the moment of entry: Fixed 0.10 Lot: $2.00 Profit 1% Risk: $1.60 Profit 4% Risk: $5.40 Profit" Requested Improvement "While the backend math is correct, it is difficult for users to see the lot size changes because they are not listed in the 'Trades' tab. I suggest adding a 'Lot Size' column to the Trades list so users can see the compounding effect as their balance grows." Adding these columns as well directly to the Trades list will solve the confusion about dynamic lot sizing: Metric Why it help transparency Lot Size Proves the system is compounding and scaling based on balance. Pip Value Shows exactly how much 1 pip is worth for that specific trade. Risk-Reward (R:R) Displays the target profit vs. the potential loss for every setup. Holding Time Tells the user how long the trade stayed open (seconds, minutes, or hours). Stop Loss (Price) Clearly shows the "Main SL" level so users can verify the risk math. also Transactions Tab (Cost Disclosure): If it possble to Show a clear list of all commissions, fees, and slippage adjustments. If possible, show a clear list of all commissions, fees, and slippage adjustments. Many users think their profit is lower due to a bug, when it is actually just the impact of trading costs. Tip for Your Suggestion When you post to the SGM site, suggest adding a "Vectored" or "Pessimistic" execution toggle in the summary. This allows users to see the "Worst Case Scenario" for their strategy, which builds massive trust in the platform's honesty. Thank you

Mohamed Ahmed About 1 month ago

💡

Feature Request

Added to Backlog

Trade Re-Entry Optimization Smart Assists

The option for time and price tolerance are great and important when it comes to accound safety against bad order execution. In the next step there should be a option to validate the re entry automatically, but not only by price or time. Because this parameters do not cover how the trade was developing before hitting entry area again. So in my oppinion this option looks like this: Sagemaster monitors also missed trades as if they were executed with the preset. As long as the trades individuell preset didnt hit any conditions that would change something in trademanagement - the trade remain valide once the entry area is hit again. For example: Preset 30 Pips SL and BE after 40 Pips. TP1 —> 60 Pips First i dont know if price and time tolerance only works in profit direction for the trade. So if we enter to much distance from the entry to stop execution but in draw down direction this would mean a better entry and should be executed. But maybe this is implemented already - didn´t check in detail. But to come to the idea of trade validation: —> Trade wasn´t executed because of price tolerance. —> Price moves in profit direction for 30 Pips in Maximum. —> Price comes back to entry area Validation check: No trade management relevant action would happened with executed trade no TP hit and also no BE move. So trade will be executed. Example 2: —> Trade runs 70 Pips into Profit —> TP triggered and SL to BE —> Market comes back to entry —> no execution. Hope this helps you to understand my idea. This would increase provider usage with great results by remaining secured from bad order execution.

Fabian Glatthaar 3 months ago

2
💡

Feature Request

Provider Preset - general Optimization

Since a provider represents a specific strategy there should be only one trade manegement solution. Like the provider should know which trade management gives the best results with their own strategy longterm. So the result would be only one preset per provider. Afterwards with backtesting and manuel edit sagemaster still ensures that a customer is able to create their own strategy which actually should not lead to better results than the provider itself. Otherwise the provider dont show the best trade management for their own strategy. Multiple presets are confusing especially for new customers. Having only one would not impact anything negatively. Personal Risk Management so or so need to be adapted in SA creation.

Fabian Glatthaar 3 months ago

💡

Feature Request

Added to Backlog

Integrated Trading Journal

To further increase the use of Sagemaster as single plattform in Trading the Integration in magic terminal with a journal tab would be amazing. To save the magic terminal analysis in the journal, than connecting it with the magic terminal orders and results and the possibility to afterwards and also in the running trade text for emotional reflection or what so ever. So a full Trading Journal based on performance statistics could be handled automatic by sagemaster combined with everything a trader should journal in text version. Like: Why Setup was valid / confirmations Which decisions were made for the trade How Trade Management were choosen Emotion Journal (confident before the trade, nervous in the running trade etc.) This would really be a big milestone in my oppinion becouse paying a connectable tool for automatic journaling for performance wouldnt be needed anymore. Journals with copied chart links in Word, OneNote, Notion etc. also could be added in Sagemaster to have everything in one source. This would really be amazing!

Fabian Glatthaar 3 months ago

1
💡

Feature Request

Added to Backlog

Magic Terminal Improvements

For replacing MetaTrader and Tradingview together in SGM some features are missing for daily trading activity. Add Limit Orders visual in the chart Add running orders visual in the chart Add SL/TP can be edited by moving the line in the chart (same as in Metatrader) Add Notification for filled Limit Orders price for own broker needs to be displayed / used for precise entry management show current symbol spread like in MetaTrader Add fixed account size for risk calculation (for example 10K account will be calculated always with 10K not dependend on past trades and current balance) Add possibility to save own Trade Management Settings like SL or BreakEven so TMM settings remain for all setups or even better as template to create multiple TMM strategys for own trading Integrate Pair Watchlist Add live average Spread in Trade calculation (example: 3 pips spread added on SL for shorts or lowers the entry for buys.) Integrate long / short Tradingview position Tool in Trademanagement —> automatically take orders as painted by the tool in the chart. NXT specific optimizations: As the system delivers clear trademanagement for all cases it would be amazing to somehow integrate it in a basic and editable way. For example: Add option to trade specific fibonacci levels once drawed in the chart. Add standard SL and BE settings possible with the above integrated TMM templates. further system specific things could be integrated longterm. I see a great opportunity in magic terminal but to really use it as daily trading tool some basic functions are still missing.

Fabian Glatthaar 3 months ago

4
💡

Feature Request